Presents the crisis situation of being a developmentally disabled individual during a wildfire in Southern California.
- Present the crisis situation of being a developementally disabled individual during a wildfire in Southern CA.
- Identify the crisis and categorize it: situational, developmental, existential or ecosystemic.
- Describe your current sense of readiness/preparedness to respond to this crisis.
- Present how your own values, beliefs, experiences, and cultural identity that might influence how you work with service users.
- Present 1 specific cultural humility challenge or cultural reflexivity challenge you see in the scenario you present.
- Identify 3-5 possible initial crisis reactions service users may experience.
- Describe a treatment model you would choose.
- Compile a list of at least 5 agencies that can serve as a resource guide that you can hand out to service users. Your resource list should include at least 3 local resources (within 50 miles). If you cannot provide 3 local resources, provide a justification.
- List the resources you would distribute to service users with detailed information on the following:
- Name of agency
- Population served
- Services provided
- Physical address
- Web link
- Contact information
- Describe your plan to minimize the risk of burnout, vicarious trauma, secondary traumatic stress, and countertransference for your team.
- Describe the leadership characteristics you will bring to this team. Include how your role as leader can influence positive social change.
- Provide a reference slide.
References:
James, R. K., & Gilliland, B. E. (2017). Crisis intervention strategies (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Ducharme, L. J., Knudsen, H. K., & Roman, P. M. (2008). Emotional exhaustion and turnover intention in human service occupations: The protective role of coworker support.Links to an external site. Sociological Spectrum, 28(1), 81–104.
EMOTIONAL EXHAUSTION AND TURNOVER INTENTION IN HUMAN SERVICE OCCUPATIONS: THE PROTECTIVE ROLE OF COWORKER SUPPORT
Lori J. Ducharme
Institute for Behavioral Research, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
Hannah K. Knudsen
College of Behavioral Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
Paul M. Roman
Department of Sociology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
Human services occupations are prone to high rates of burnout and turn- over. These outcomes have adverse implications for service providers and the clients in their care. Several studies have assessed the structural causes and consequences of burnout and turnover, but little attention has been paid to the potentially protective role of coworker support. We estimate a structural equation model including job characteristics, co- worker support, and workplace justice to predict turnover intention, both directly and indirectly through emotional exhaustion. More than 1,800 substance abuse treatment counselors provided survey data for these analyses. Net of demographic and workload measures, low autonomy,
This research was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse
(R01DA13110 and R01DA14482). The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do
not represent the official views of the funding agency.
Address correspondence to Lori J. Ducharme, Institute for Behavioral Research, 101
Barrow Hall, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602-2401, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Sociological Spectrum, 28: 81–104, 2008
Copyright # Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN: 0273-2173 print/1521-0707 online
DOI: 10.1080/02732170701675268
and a lack of distributive justice significantly predicted emotional exhaustion, while coworker support was inversely associated with exhaustion. In turn, exhaustion was a significant predictor of intent to quit. Coworker support exhibited direct inverse effects on intent to quit, while counselors reporting low autonomy and lack of workplace justice were more likely to be contemplating quitting. These findings extend pre- vious research by identifying specific and beneficial effects of coworker support on counselors’ job-related affect and well-being.
As the U.S. economy shifts increasingly to service work from production occupations, more attention is drawn to the unique stres- sors and health outcomes of workers engaged in emotional labor in the day-to-day context of interacting with clients and customers (Hochschild 1983; Wharton 1999). Much attention has been paid to the service sector, and the repeated surface acting roles in which workers engage in order to complete discrete, time-limited transac- tions (e.g., in-store sales, restaurant service, call centers). In routine service work, employee-customer exchanges are such that neither party has a high emotional investment in the encounter, nor is the interaction highly emotionally charged. Such interactions, however, occur with great frequency in these occupations. By contrast, other forms of service work—especially counseling and other human ser- vice occupations—are characterized by less frequent but more intense encounters whose success depends in large part upon the worker’s ability to make a significant and sustained emotional investment in the client ‘‘transaction.’’
Several studies have failed to find a link between frequency of service work interactions and emotional exhaustion or burnout (Bulan et al. 1997; Morris and Feldman 1996); however, emotional exhaustion has often been associated with occupations characterized by a greater intensity of interpersonal interactions, such as counseling, nursing, teaching, and other ‘‘caring’’ or ‘‘helping’’ professions (Maslach 1978). A key distinction between routine service work and the helping professions is that the former is characterized by the deliv- ery of a discrete service or completion of a fixed transaction, whereas the latter involves the evoking of some change in the client, whether physical, emotional, or cognitive. Counseling occupations represent one segment of the broader service industry in which the successful delivery of care is fundamentally dependent on the counselor’s ability to establish a strong, lasting, and meaningful bond with the client. Counselors generally refer to this relationship as the ‘‘therapeutic alliance,’’ literally referring to the ‘‘emotional bond and . . . shared pre- sumption regarding the tasks and goals of the treatment endeavor’’
82 L. J. Ducharme et al.
between counselor and client (Connors et al. 1997, p. 588). In this cir- cumstance, emotional labor requires deep acting—an ability to empathize with a client, identify her needs, advocate for her care, and stimulate change in her attitudes and behaviors. It seems reason- able, then, to posit that the experience and impact of stress emanating from this class of service encounters may be substantially different than the stressors encountered in jobs requiring a lesser investment on the part of other service workers. As such, the potential mediating effects of organizational contexts and work environments for these occupations warrants exploration.
In human services occupations such as substance abuse and mental health counseling, clients often bring a collection of disparate service needs and related issues to the treatment encounter. Addressing these co-occurring and ancillary needs, and coordinating the receipt of ser- vices with the treatment of the client’s underlying diagnosis, can tax counselors’ energy and emotional resources. Moreover, addiction cli- ents treated in even the ‘‘best’’ facilities are prone to high rates of relapse, yielding frustration among clinicians who invest significant emotional resources in building their therapeutic alliance. Over time, the cumulative effects of managing a client caseload can lead to fati- gue, exhaustion, and burnout (Budrionis et al. 1987; Niehoff 1984). As a result, turnover rates among addiction treatment counselors are high (McLellan et al. 2003), and are a source of constant concern for program managers (Gallon et al. 2003).
There is a substantial accumulated literature in the sociology of work and occupations that has examined the structural features of work environments and the content of work, and linked these to job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and retention. An increasing emphasis has been placed on the social climate of the work setting and its relationship to worker affect and well-being. Much of this social climate is a product of management practices and policies that lead employees to perceive that they are valued and integral members of the organization. Less emphasized in the context of work environment analyses is the potential beneficial role of coworker support in mediating the stresses inherent in the performance of emotional labor.
There is still much ground to be covered in integrating the structural and social elements of the work environment into a comprehensive model of workers’ health and behavior outcomes. As in many human services occupations, the addiction treatment counseling field is char- acterized by consistently high burnout and turnover rates despite var- iations in workload and management practices across occupational settings. Thus, an exploration of the interplay between the work
Exhaustion and Turnover Intention in Human Service 83
environment (including coworker relationships) and counselors’ retention and well-being not only has theoretical implications for the sociological study of work and health, but also practical implica- tions for the management of behavioral healthcare programs and, by extension, other human services organizations. In this article, we examine the effects of coworker support on the emotional exhaustion and turnover intentions of more than 1,800 behavioral health coun- selors employed in nationally-representative samples of substance abuse treatment programs.
BURNOUT AND EMOTIONAL EXHAUSTION IN COUNSELORS
‘‘Burnout’’ is a generic term that is commonly used to describe the exhaustion and distancing behaviors experienced by human services workers and other helping professionals in response to the excessive emotional demands that characterize their jobs (Jackson et al. 1986). In studies of human service workers, the various dimensions of burn- out have been associated with poorer job performance as well as adverse health outcomes. In terms of job performance, burnout has been associated with absenteeism, ineffectiveness, interpersonal con- flict, lower productivity, job dissatisfaction, reduced organizational commitment, and turnover (Maslach and Jackson 1986). Of parti- cular importance for clients is the finding that burnout can be ‘‘con- tagious’’ among staff, and unit-level burnout among counselors and nurses has been associated with lower client satisfaction with services received (Garman et al. 2002; Vahey et al. 2004).
The emotional exhaustion component of burnout has repeatedly been associated with stress-related health outcomes. Emotional exhaustion predicts increased rates of illness, fatigue, and substance abuse (Cherniss 1980; Pines and Maslach 1978), as well as depression, anxiety, and irritability (Jayaratne et al. 1986). In their review of pub- lished literature, Glass and McKnight (1996) found a nearly uni- formly positive association between burnout and depressive symptomatology. Thus, the experience of conditions leading to emotional exhaustion can have significant implications for counse- lors, in terms of both their employment and well-being. In the context of this article, we differentiate between burnout as a general concept and emotional exhaustion as the specific, proximal outcome of inter- est. Given the documented associations between emotional exhaus- tion and adverse health outcomes, we focus on exhaustion as a key dependent variable in these analyses.
84 L. J. Ducharme et al.
TURNOVER INTENTION
In addition to the health impacts of overwork, another adverse out- come linked to exhaustion is turnover. Addiction treatment counsel- ing is generally regarded as an inherently stressful and frustrating occupation, which may predispose treatment program employees to higher turnover rates (Layne et al. 2004). Indeed, voluntary turnover among addiction treatment counselors is a significant problem for treatment facilities and their clients (Hser 1995; Laundergan et al. 1986), and counselor turnover rates range from 25% to 50% annually in the public sector (Gallon et al. 2003; McLellan et al. 2003). These rates surpass the national average of 19.2% annual voluntary turn- over (quits) across all occupations, and the 17.7% annual quit rate among occupations in healthcare and social assistance (Bureau of Labor Statistics 2004).
Turnover among human services occupations has adverse implica- tions not only for the organization, but also for the clients in its care. Turnover among counselors creates instability for both the treatment facility and for clients who depend on a stable therapeutic relation- ship to support their recovery (Hser 1995). As a result, clients may suffer setbacks such as a loss of trust in the treatment facility or the therapeutic process when their clinical services are disrupted by their primary counselor’s departure. Turnover can intensify stress among remaining counselors whose caseloads increase, and can have adverse effects on quality of care when newer, less-experienced staff are hired into vacant positions (Powell and York 1992). When turn- over rates are high, large numbers of clients within a treatment facility can be personally affected by the resulting discontinuity in service delivery (Lum et al. 1998). It is also worth noting that, while turnover has many adverse effects, clients are also affected when counselors experience burnout but remain with the organization. Thus, both burnout and turnover in this occupational group adversely impact client recovery, service quality, and organizational effectiveness (Mulvey et al. 2003).
PREDICTORS OF BURNOUT AND TURNOVER
Given the implications of counselors’ emotional exhaustion and turn- over for treatment facilities and their clients, it is important to iden- tify work-related predictors of these outcomes that might effectively be altered to enhance counselors’ job satisfaction, commitment, and long-term retention. Among human services occupations, workload (e.g., client caseload) is widely cited as a major contributor to both
Exhaustion and Turnover Intention in Human Service 85
burnout and turnover intention (Alexander et al. 1998; Janssen et al. 1999; Schaufeli and Enzmann 1998). Relatedly, the content of work tasks also plays an important role. For counselors, the percentage of work hours spent on activities other than counseling—for example, administrative paperwork, supervision, case management—has had documented effects on reported emotional exhaustion (Acker 1999; Johnson and Rubin 1983; Rubin 1984). Burnout itself is a strong predictor of intent to quit in counseling occupations (Blankertz and Robinson 1997; Drake and Yadama 1996).
Beyond the stresses inherent in managing a client caseload, broader elements of the work environment have also been associated with exhaustion and turnover intention among counselors. In parti- cular, management practices that result in rewarding work experi- ences have shown direct effects on reducing turnover intention (Griffeth et al. 2000; Jamal 1990; Vinokur-Kalpan et al. 1994). Among the elements of ‘‘rewarding’’ work are autonomy and decision latitude (Karasek 1979). Turnover intention has been found to be higher among clinicians reporting low levels of autonomy at work (Arches 1991; Cherniss 1980; Knudsen et al. 2003; Lecroy and Rank 1987).
Another key element of the work environment is perceived fairness of program management. Notably, in studies of mental health profes- sionals, perceived inequity on the job led to increased resentment, which predicted turnover (Geurts et al. 1998). By contrast, work set- tings characterized by higher levels of procedural and distributive justice tend to have lower turnover levels (Lum et al. 1998; Hendrix et al. 1999).
As in any environment, counselors bring with them to the work- place certain characteristics that are not amenable to change, but that nevertheless influence their propensity to experience exhaustion or quit their jobs. Among these, age and educational attainment signi- ficantly predict turnover, as younger, more highly-educated, and better-trained counselors are more marketable and mobile, and thus prone to seek more rewarding employment opportunities elsewhere (Blankertz and Robinson 1997; Jinnett and Alexander 1999). Simi- larly, professionalism (as measured by credentials such as certifi- cation and licensure) has been found to predict nursing turnover in hospitals (Bloom et al. 1992); however, once counselors become established within a treatment center, they may be less likely to leave, as is evidenced by the inverse association between tenure and turn- over (Bloom et al. 1992; Gray and Phillips 1994; Somers 1995).
The characteristics of individual counselors, their client caseloads, and their work environments have been examined in the context of
86 L. J. Ducharme et al.
studies on burnout, turnover intention, and actual turnover. While the relationships among these categories of variables have been fairly well documented, less attention has been paid to the role of interper- sonal relations between counselors and its potential protective effects against exhaustion, adverse health outcomes, job dissatisfaction, and turnover. This article seeks to extend existing research by considering the impact of coworker support on counselors’ affective and beha- vioral reactions to demanding and unrewarding work.
COWORKER SUPPORT AS A PROTECTIVE FACTOR
Few studies have directly examined the role of coworker support in the experience of exhaustion and intent to quit among counseling professionals. Within the limited published literature, studies that incorporate support measures tend to have methodological or measurement weaknesses that detract from the potential value of their findings. Notably, many of these studies measure supervisor or organizational support, but not coworker support, or they com- bine these three sources of workplace support into a single measure; others confound work-based support with more general coping stra- tegies or with support received from family and friends outside the workplace (Bennett et al. 1994; Layne et al. 2004; Lee and Ashforth 1993; Shoptaw et al. 2000). A more common issue is that these studies often rely on small sample sizes that do not represent a sufficiently diverse array of counselors or work settings to yield confidence in the substantive significance or generalizability of their findings (Layne et al. 2004; Shoptaw et al. 2000; Elman and Dowd 1997). In terms of studies that specifically focus on burnout or turnover among substance abuse counselors, these have not examined the potential influence of coworker support (e.g., Gallon et al. 2003; Knudsen et al. 2003, 2006).
Despite the limitations of these studies, their accumulated findings suggest that work-based social support may effectively reduce coun- selors’ experience of burnout and may directly or indirectly reduce their likelihood of leaving their jobs. In a field such as addiction counseling, in which high turnover rates are an ongoing challenge, there is great potential benefit to be gained from a better understand- ing of available resources that can be leveraged to enhance workforce stability within provider organizations. For example, Bennett and colleagues (1994) found an association between a general measure of social support and burnout among HIV=AIDS counselors, while Shoptaw and colleagues (2000) reported a negative association between work-based support and exhaustion. A number of studies
Exhaustion and Turnover Intention in Human Service 87
report significant inverse associations between coworker support and burnout generally (Pines and Maslach 1978; Poulin and Walter 1993; Lee and Ashforth 1993; Schaufeli and Enzmann 1998), as well as exhaustion specifically (Janssen et al. 1999). Notably, Bowden (1994) found that practical support (as distinct from affective or emotional support) from coworkers had a significant negative effect on burnout among mental health staff, while Brown and colleagues (2003) found that support from coworkers had more influence on exhaustion than did support from family, friends, or other nonwork sources. As in the broader support literature, debate persists as to whether support effectively buffers (i.e., moderates) the relationship between suboptimal working conditions and employees’ well-being, and mixed findings are reported in studies focusing on counseling occupations (Himle et al. 1989; Jayaratne and Chess 1984; Koeske and Koeske 1989; Shinn et al. 1984).
Research also suggests an inverse association between work-based social support and turnover in human services occupations. Lichtenstein and colleagues (2004) found that satisfaction with coworkers was inversely related to turnover intention among clinicians treating cli- ents with serious mental illness. In a study of child life specialists, Munn and colleagues (1996) found that supervisor support had direct effects on job satisfaction and turnover intention, but not on exhaustion. Alexander and colleagues (1998) found that coworker support had a significant negative effect on both intent to quit and actual turnover in a study of nurses in long-term psychiatric settings. In a review of the literature on turnover intention and actual turn- over in human services professionals, Acker (1999) concluded that social support (variously measured) had consistent negative effects on intent to quit and turnover. Similarly, other studies have found a direct relationship between work-based support and retention (Jayaratne and Chess 1984; Siefert et al. 1991; Schaefer and Moos 1996; Blankertz and Robinson 1997; Alexander et al. 1998; Jinnett and Alexander 1999).
While the findings of these studies generally support the contention that positive coworker relations can have beneficial effects for coun- selors’ careers and well-being, more research is needed to establish the influence of coworker support on these processes. Our review of the published literature on burnout and=or turnover among counselors, nurses, and case workers found that none of these studies simul- taneously measured coworker support, burnout=exhaustion, and intent to quit. As a result, the direct and indirect effects of support on counselors’ affective and behavioral reactions to stressful working environments have not yet been fully specified. To address this gap,
88 L. J. Ducharme et al.
this article examines the effects of workload, working conditions, and coworker support on the emotional exhaustion and turnover intention of counselors in substance abuse treatment settings. The proposed model replicates some prior exploratory research using a large, broadly representative sample of addiction counselors, and extends prior research by focusing explicitly on instrumental support received from coworkers.
METHODS
Sampling of Treatment Programs and Counselors
Data are drawn from questionnaires collected as part of a larger study of addiction treatment programs and their services. Data were gathered from counselors within two nationally representative sam- ples of treatment facilities. Treatment facilities were selected via a two-stage random sampling process, stratifying first on geographic location (county) and then sampling treatment facilities within strata. A total of N ¼ 401 privately funded substance abuse treatment pro- grams and N ¼ 362 publicly-funded programs participated in data collection activities occurring between Fall 2002 and Spring 2004. These facilities include for-profit and non-profit, hospital-based and freestanding programs providing inpatient, residential, and=or outpatient addiction treatment services. The number of participating centers represents 87% of the sampled private centers and 80% of the sampled public centers.
Administrators of each participating facility were asked to provide a list of all substance abuse counselors employed by the program. Each counselor was then mailed a questionnaire focusing on program management, workplace climate, services provided, and awareness and use of a variety of evidence-based treatment practices. The response rate for counselors was 62% in the private programs, and 61% in the public programs. Analyses comparing the demographic characteristics and credentials of responding counselors to the known characteristics of all counselors surveyed indicated no significant response biases in either sample (data not shown). Unweighted data from both counselor samples (total N ¼ 2,304) were pooled for these analyses, with the study sample (i.e., public sector or private sector) included as a control variable to account for any systematic differ- ences in working conditions between the two samples. All variables used in these analyses are person-level data obtained from counselor questionnaire responses.
Exhaustion and Turnover Intention in Human Service 89
Measures
Work Environment We use several objective measures of counselors’ workload as well as three more general measures of the work environment. First, counse- lors reported the total number of hours worked per week. In the frequency distributions presented in Table 1, actual hours are reported; in the subsequent models, the natural log transformation of this variable is used to adjust for skew. Counselors’ reports of exhaustion and intent to quit are expected to be positively associated with weekly work hours. Second, counselors reported the number of hours per week spent in direct patient care (i.e., counseling), as well as the number of hours in administrative activities such as meetings or paperwork, and hours in training activities. We computed the percentage of time per week spent in direct patient care. Previous research (cited above) suggests that counselors spending proportion- ately less time in direct patient care activities should be more prone to exhaustion and intent to quit; however, it is equally plausible that exhaustion increases directly with the amount of client contact. Third, we expect that caseload size (i.e., the number of patients assigned to the counselor) will be positively associated with exhaustion and turnover intention. We use dichotomous variables defining three roughly equal
Table 1. Descriptive statistics for observed variables
Sample Mean or %
Counselor Demographics
Women 61.2%
Nonwhite 27.4%
Age 45.4 years (sd ¼ 10.9)
Education and Credentials
Less than College 22.5%
College Degree 34.9%
Master’s or higher 42.6%
Certified 56.1%
In recovery 51.6%
Tenure at Center 5.1 years (sd ¼ 5.3)
Job Characteristics
Hours per Week 38.5 hours (sd ¼ 11.5)
% Time in Direct Care 47.3% (sd ¼ 16.8)
Small Caseload ( < 10) 42.8%
Medium Caseload (11–20) 24.8%
Large Caseload ( > 20) 28.6%
Annual Salary $25,000–$35,000
Public-Sector Program 52.4%
90 L. J. Ducharme et al.
groups of counselors by caseload size: small caseload (ten or fewer patients, used as the reference category), medium caseload size (11–20 patients) and large caseloads (21 or more patients).
Three constructed variables are used to measure the extent of decision latitude and fairness perceived by counselors in their work setting. Job autonomy was measured using three items adapted from Pritchard and Karasek (1973). These items asked counselors the extent to which they had sufficient authority and decision latitude to perform their job tasks. Distributive justice was measured using four items asking counselors to rate the extent to which they per- ceived the distribution of workload, compensation, and fringe bene- fits to be fair. Procedural justice was measured using eight items asking counselors to rate the extent to which management involves employees in decision-making processes, accepts feedback, and explains decisions in an adequate and timely manner. Both sets of organizational justice items were adapted from workplace research by Niehoff and Moorman (1993). Consistent with prior organiza- tional research using these items, we expect that counselors reporting greater levels of autonomy, distributive justice, and procedural justice will be less likely to report emotional exhaustion or to be planning to quit their jobs.
Coworker Support Eight items adapted from Tang (1999) were used to measure co- worker support. Counselors were asked to rate their agreement (on a seven-point scale) with statements about their coworkers’ helpfulness, knowledge, and creativity in problem-solving. These items generally tap instrumental and informational support, and include such state- ments as ‘‘I find my coworkers helpful when I encounter difficulties with my work,’’ and ‘‘My coworkers and I are able to come up with creative ideas when we face tough problems.’’
Outcome Variables The emotional exhaustion component of the Maslach Burnout Inven- tory (MBI; Maslach and Jackson 1986) was used to measure the first of two key outcome variables in these analyses. The MBI is a well- validated and widely used measure of ‘‘burnout’’ among human ser- vice professionals, and the emotional exhaustion component is clearly differentiated from other constructs measured by the full inventory (Maslach and Jackson 1981, 1986). The exhaustion component was used in this survey because it is the component of burnout with the most direct and consequential health implications (Cherniss 1980; Jayaratne et al. 1986; Pines and Maslach 1978).
Exhaustion and Turnover Intention in Human Service 91
Counselors’ intent to quit was measured using three items by Walsh, Ashford, and Hill (1985). These items asked counselors to rate their agreement (on a seven-point scale) with statements about the extent to which they are thinking about leaving their job or actively looking for work elsewhere. Measuring intention to quit rather than retrospectively examining quitters allows us to under- stand factors that are most salient during this decision-making pro- cess. In studies that have examined both intentions and actual behavior, intent to quit emerges as the single strongest predictor of actual turnover (Alexander et al. 1998; Hendrix et al. 1999).
Control Variables Several control variables are included in these analyses to account for systematic differences that may be introduced by counselors’ demo- graphic and background characteristics. First, our models control for gender (1 ¼ women, 0 ¼ men), race (1 ¼ nonwhite, 0 ¼ white), and age. Several additional variables control for counselors’ creden- tials and marketability, which may influence their turnover inten- tions. Education is measured using three dichotomous variables: less than a college degree (reference category), college degree, and master’s degree or higher. Because other analyses of this dataset indi- cate that counselors in recovery from their own addictions face sys- tematic disadvantages in terms of compensation, we control for recovery status (1 ¼ in recovery, 0 ¼ not in recovery). Certification status is measur