Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Design and present a single-subject research study based on a case study. Students will define the dependent variable (based on the target problem behaviors) - Essay Masters

Design and present a single-subject research study based on a case study. Students will define the dependent variable (based on the target problem behaviors)

Assignment 1

Applied Single-Subject Project 

Instructions:
Design and present a single-subject research study based on a case study. Students will define the dependent variable (based on the target problem behaviors) in measurable and observable terms, utilize an appropriate measurement system, and evaluate the effects of a treatment through graphing the data in an appropriate single-subject research design. Students will then assess the generalization of the treatment effects and evaluate the effectiveness of a strategy for promoting treatment generalization. 

Please read the Case Study and use it to answer the questions below.
For your convenience, a PDF version of this assignment is provided.
(Case Study and PDF version of this assignment attached)

Part I: Treatment Effectiveness 

  1. Identify      the dependent variable being addressed in the case study. To do this, you      should specify at least three specific target behaviors that are      considered part of the overall response class (i.e., the set of responses      that achieve the same function).  
  2. Define      each of the target behaviors in specific, observable, and measurable      terms. 
  3. Identify      what measurement dimension of the overall dependent      variable will be assessed (i.e., frequency, duration, latency, etc.) with      what type of recording system (e.g., permanent product      recording, event recording, interval recording, etc.). (Please refer to      Table 7.2 on page 152 in your textbook by Mayer et al. (2022) for a chart      of possible methods and reasons to use them.) 
  4. Identify      what single-subject design is being used to evaluate the effects of the      intervention. 
  5. Create      a graph of the data during the four phases (see the table). (Table Attached) (You can refer      to Exercise 2 to learn how to graph this type of single-subject design      using Excel.) 
  6. Examine      your graph and state whether the intervention was effective.   
  7. Explain      your conclusion based on principles of visual analysis. Refer to the      magnitude/level of performance, the trend in performance, and the      variability in performance for the data in each phase. 

Part II: Treatment Generalization 

After the behavior analyst evaluated the effectiveness of the treatment, she wanted to fade the number of times John asked for breaks so that he would not miss as much classwork. She continued to collect data on the dependent variable while fading the number of allowed requests from 5 to 1.  

She was also interested in knowing if the effects would generalize to the other two classrooms where John displayed disruptive behavior. She had asked the teachers of those classrooms to collect data on John’s disruptive behavior throughout the baseline and intervention implemented in Classroom 1.  

The figures shows additional data on the disruptive behavior across all three Classrooms at the end of the second intervention phase of classroom 1, and during the phase when the number of break requests were faded down to only one.  (Figures attached)

  1. When      the behavior analyst had teachers collect data in all three classrooms      throughout the study such that the data could be plotted on three graphs      aligned vertically, what type of single-subject design was the behavior      analyst using? 
  2. The      behavior analyst was interested in analyzing the presence or absence of      change in the dependent variable in Classrooms 2 and 3 in order to      evaluate what type of generalization? 
  3. Based      on the data in Classrooms 2 and 3 when the initial intervention and fading      procedures were implemented in Classroom 1, did the treatment effects      generalize to the other classrooms? How do you know?  

The behavior analyst remembered that there are several suggested methods for planning ahead for generalization. One method relies on the use of “mediated stimuli” (stimuli that can be used for the response in both the training and generalization settings). (See the section entitled “Contrive a Mediating Stimulus,” pp. 743-744 in Cooper et al. (2020).)  

The behavior analyst decided to create a mediating stimulus in the form of a “Break Card” that John would use to request his break during the intervention (instead of simply raising his hand). During the “Break Card” phase, he was given a card with the word “Break” to put on his desk. He was also provided with instructions to raise it up when he needed a 5-minute break to visit the calm corner, and he was allowed to do that one time during the class. A similar “Break Card” was placed on his desk in Classrooms 2 and 3 as a mediating stimulus, but John was not provided with any instructions on how he could use the card to ask for a break.  

4. What (if any) effect did the break card and instructions in Classroom 1 (plus the presence of a break card in Classrooms 2 and 3 without instructions) have on the dependent variable in Classroom 2 and 3? How did behavior change or not change in each Classroom? Was generalization shown in Classrooms 2 and/or 3? 

Next the behavior analyst decided to implement the Break Card treatment in Classroom 2. This meant that she provided specific instructions to John that he could use the break card on his desk in that classroom to ask for a break one time during the class. 

5. What (if any) effect did the introduction of the break card phase (break card + instructions) in Classroom 2 have on the dependent variable in classroom 2 and classroom 3? Was generalization shown in Classroom 3?  

6. Why do you think the behavior analyst did not implement the break card intervention (break card + instructions) in Classroom 3?   

7. Write a summary statement to explain under what conditions generalization did and did not occur in this study.   

8. Make a suggestion for future treatment based on what was learned about generalization in this study. 

Please note: Your assignment should be submitted in a Word Document format using Times New Roman 12. The assignment must use APA format (See link to APA publication style in the course site resources.)  Please include an appropriate heading on your paper and references to support methods or procedures used.

Please be sure to save your work using the naming convention:

Student last name, first name, ABA 504 Assignment 1

To view how you will be graded on this assignment, refer to the Grading Rubric. (Attached)

 

It is expected that your assignment submissions will conform to the American Psychological Association (APA) Style and Grammar Guidelines

Assignment 1

Applied Single-Subject Project 

Instructions:  Design and present a single-subject research study based on a case study. Students will define the dependent variable (based on the target problem behaviors) in measurable and observable terms, utilize an appropriate measurement system, and evaluate the effects of a treatment through graphing the data in an appropriate single-subject research design. Students will then assess the generalization of the treatment effects and evaluate the effectiveness of a strategy for promoting treatment generalization. 

Please read the  Case Study  and use it to answer the questions below. For your convenience, a  PDF version of this assignment  is provided. (Case Study and PDF version of this assignment attached)

Part I: Treatment Effectiveness 

1. Identify the dependent variable being addressed in the case study. To do this, you should specify at least three specific target behaviors that are considered part of the overall response class (i.e., the set of responses that achieve the same function).  

2. Define each of the target behaviors in specific, observable, and measurable terms. 

3. Identify what measurement  dimension of the overall dependent variable will be assessed (i.e., frequency, duration, latency, etc.) with what type of  recording system (e.g., permanent product recording, event recording, interval recording, etc.). (Please refer to Table 7.2 on page 152 in your textbook by Mayer et al. (2022) for a chart of possible methods and reasons to use them.) 

4. Identify what single-subject design is being used to evaluate the effects of the intervention. 

5. Create a graph of the data during the four phases (see the  table ). ( Table Attached) (You can refer to Exercise 2 to learn how to graph this type of single-subject design using Excel.) 

6. Examine your graph and state whether the intervention was effective.   

7. Explain your conclusion based on principles of visual analysis. Refer to the magnitude/level of performance, the trend in performance, and the variability in performance for the data in each phase. 

Part II: Treatment Generalization 

 After the behavior analyst evaluated the effectiveness of the treatment, she wanted to fade the number of times John asked for breaks so that he would not miss as much classwork. She continued to collect data on the dependent variable while fading the number of allowed requests from 5 to 1.  

She was also interested in knowing if the effects would generalize to the other two classrooms where John displayed disruptive behavior. She had asked the teachers of those classrooms to collect data on John’s disruptive behavior throughout the baseline and intervention implemented in Classroom 1.  

The  figures  shows additional data on the disruptive behavior across all three Classrooms at the end of the second intervention phase of classroom 1, and during the phase when the number of break requests were faded down to only one.   (Figures attached)

1. When the behavior analyst had teachers collect data in all three classrooms throughout the study such that the data could be plotted on three graphs aligned vertically, what type of single-subject design was the behavior analyst using? 

2. The behavior analyst was interested in analyzing the presence or absence of change in the dependent variable in Classrooms 2 and 3 in order to evaluate what type of generalization? 

3. Based on the data in Classrooms 2 and 3 when the initial intervention and fading procedures were implemented in Classroom 1, did the treatment effects generalize to the other classrooms? How do you know?  

The behavior analyst remembered that there are several suggested methods for planning ahead for generalization. One method relies on the use of “mediated stimuli” (stimuli that can be used for the response in both the training and generalization settings). (See the section entitled “Contrive a Mediating Stimulus,” pp. 743-744 in Cooper et al. (2020).)  

The behavior analyst decided to create a mediating stimulus in the form of a “Break Card” that John would use to request his break during the intervention (instead of simply raising his hand). During the “Break Card” phase, he was given a card with the word “Break” to put on his desk. He was also provided with instructions to raise it up when he needed a 5-minute break to visit the calm corner, and he was allowed to do that one time during the class. A similar “Break Card” was placed on his desk in Classrooms 2 and 3 as a mediating stimulus, but John was not provided with any instructions on how he could use the card to ask for a break.  

4. What (if any) effect did the break card and instructions in Classroom 1 (plus the presence of a break card in Classrooms 2 and 3 without instructions) have on the dependent variable in Classroom 2 and 3? How did behavior change or not change in each Classroom? Was generalization shown in Classrooms 2 and/or 3? 

Next the behavior analyst decided to implement the Break Card treatment in Classroom 2. This meant that she provided specific instructions to John that he could use the break card on his desk in that classroom to ask for a break one time during the class. 

5. What (if any) effect did the introduction of the break card phase (break card + instructions) in Classroom 2 have on the dependent variable in classroom 2 and classroom 3? Was generalization shown in Classroom 3?  

6. Why do you think the behavior analyst did not implement the break card intervention (break card + instructions) in Classroom 3?   

7. Write a summary statement to explain under what conditions generalization did and did not occur in this study.   

8. Make a suggestion for future treatment based on what was learned about generalization in this study. 

Please note: Your assignment should be submitted in a  Word Document format  using Times New Roman 12. The assignment must use APA format (See link to APA publication style in the course site resources.)  Please include an appropriate heading on your paper and references to support methods or procedures used.

Please be sure to save your work using the naming convention:

Student last name, first name, ABA 504 Assignment 1

To view how you will be graded on this assignment, refer to the  Grading Rubric . (Attached)

It is expected that your assignment submissions will conform to the American Psychological Association (APA)  Style and Grammar Guidelines

,

ABA504 Assignment Table Days Baseline Intervention

(Break

Requests)

Baseline Intervention

(Break

Requests)

1 4      

2 5      

3 4      

4 6      

     

5 2

6   0    

7   2    

8   1    

9     4  

10     6  

11     4  

12     5  

13       1

14       2

15       0

16       1

,

Please read the following case study and use it to answer the questions for the assignment.

John is a 12-year-old boy who has been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

(ADHD). Sometimes when in class at school, John engages in disruptive behavior, particularly

when the teacher is asking questions that John does not know how to answer. This can happen

several times during the day (typically 4-5 times on average), and occurs in three of his classes

(math, language arts, and science).

John’s disruptive behaviors specifically include yelling profanities, kicking over his desk or the

desk of another student, and tipping over his chair such that it falls to the floor with him in it. All

of his classes are general education classes, and other students complain when John has one of

his outbursts. At times he has injured himself or another student as well.

After John engages in a disruptive behavior (as described above), his teachers typically tell him

to go sit in the “calm corner” where there are books to read. He is allowed to stay there for 5-10

minutes before he is required to resume working on his tasks.

A behavior analyst conducts a functional behavior assessment and determines that the function

of the disruptive behavior is escape from task demands. She collects baseline data on the

dependent variable and then implements an intervention that involves John being given access to

the calm corner based on requesting a break from his schoolwork (and NOT based on engaging

in disruptive behavior). At first, John is allowed to ask for a break up to 5 times a day in the class

where the intervention is introduced (Classroom 1). (Later this will be faded down to one time

per day.)

After collecting data for several sessions while the intervention is in place, the intervention is

removed such that John does not get access to the calm corner based on requesting a break, but

instead gains access as a result of his disruptive behavior (as in baseline). In the fourth phase of

the study, the intervention is reinstated and the effect on disruptive behavior is again measured.

,

ABA504 Assignment 1 Rubric

Part I: Treatment Effectiveness

1. Identify the dependent variable being addressed in the case study. To do this, you should specify at least three specific target behaviors that are considered part of the

overall response class (i.e., the set of responses that achieve the same function).

2. Define each of the target behaviors in specific, observable, and measurable terms.

3. Identify what measurement dimension of the overall dependent variable will be assessed (i.e., frequency, duration, latency, etc.) with what type of recording system (e.g.,

permanent product recording, event recording, interval recording, etc.). (Please refer to Table 7.2 on page 152 in your textbook by Mayer et al. (2022) for a chart of

possible methods and reasons to use them.)

4. Identify what single-subject design is being used to evaluate the effects of the intervention.

5. Create a graph of the data during the four phases (see the table). (You can refer to Exercise 2 to learn how to graph this type of single-subject design using Excel.)

6. Examine your graph and state whether the intervention was effective.

7. Explain your conclusion based on principles of visual analysis. Refer to the magnitude/level of performance, the trend in performance, and the variability in performance

for the data in each phase.

Part II: Treatment Generalization

1. When the behavior analyst had teachers collect data in all three classrooms throughout the study such that the data could be plotted on three graphs aligned vertically,

what type of single-subject design was the behavior analyst using?

2. The behavior analyst was interested in analyzing the presence or absence of change in the dependent variable in Classrooms 2 and 3 in order to evaluate what type of

generalization?

3. Based on the data in Classrooms 2 and 3 when the initial intervention and fading procedures were implemented in Classroom 1, did the treatment effects generalize to the

other classrooms? How do you know?

4. What (if any) effect did the break card and instructions in Classroom 1 (plus the presence of a break card in Classrooms 2 and 3 without instructions) have on the

dependent variable in Classroom 2 and 3? How did behavior change or not change in each Classroom? Was generalization shown in Classrooms 2 and/or 3?

5. What (if any) effect did the introduction of the break card phase (break card + instructions) in Classroom 2 have on the dependent variable in Classrooms 2 and 3? Was

generalization shown in Classroom 3?

6. Why do you think the behavior analyst did not implement the break card intervention (break card + instructions) in Classroom 3?

7. Write a summary statement to explain under what conditions generalization did and did not occur in this study.

8. Make a suggestion for future treatment based on what was learned about generalization in this study.

Grading item

Completely accurate

in content and

clearly articulated

Partially inaccurate

in content OR

somewhat unclear in

articulation

Partially inaccurate

in content AND

unclear in

articulation

Item is missing or

completely

inaccurate in

content

Total

Part I: Treatment Effects

1. Identify the overall dependent variable and

state at least three specific target behaviors

that make up the response class

4

(1 point per item)

1-3

(Based on # items)

1 0

2. Provide an operational definition of each

target behavior.

6

(2 points per item)

4

(Based on # items)

2

(Based on # items)

0

3. Identify what dimension of the dependent

variable will be measured.

5 3 1 0

4. Identify what type of recording system will

be used.

5 3 1 0

5. Identify what single-subject design is being

used.

5 3 1 0

6. Create a graph of the data.

10 7 4 0

7. Explain whether the intervention was

effective, referring to the level, trend, and

variability in each phase.

9 6 3 0

PART II: Generalization Effects

1. Identify the type of single-subject design

used when data were collected across three

classrooms.

5 3 1 0

2. Identify the type of generalization being

evaluated when looking at changes in

Classrooms 2 and 3 during the intervention

in Classroom 1.

5 3 1 0

3. Explain if the initial treatment effects of

requesting breaks generalized to

Classrooms 2 and 3.

5 3 1 0

4. Explain if the effects of the Break Card

intervention in Classroom 1 generalized to

classrooms 2 and 3.

5 3 1 0

5. Explain the effects of introducing the Break

Card intervention in Classroom 2 on the

dependent variable in Classrooms 2 and 3,

including whether generalization was

shown in Classroom 3.

5 3 1 0

6. Explain why the intervention was not

introduced to Classroom 3.

5 3 1 0

7. Explain under what conditions

generalization did and did not occur in this

study.

9 6 3 0

8. Suggest a future treatment based on what

was learned about generalization in the

study.

5 3 1 0

Overall Writing (clarity, APA style formatting)

12 8 4 0

Final Grade

,

Applied Single-Subject Project

Instructions:

Design and present a single-subject research study based on a case study. Students will define the

dependent variable (based on the target problem behaviors) in measurable and observable terms,

utilize an appropriate measurement system, and evaluate the effects of a treatment through

graphing the data in an appropriate single-subject research design. Students will then assess the

generalization of the treatment effects and evaluate the effectiveness of a strategy for promoting

treatment generalization.

Please read the following case study and use it to answer the questions below.

John is a 12-year-old boy who has been diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

(ADHD). Sometimes when in class at school, John engages in disruptive behavior, particularly

when the teacher is asking questions that John does not know how to answer. This can happen

several times during the day (typically 4-5 times on average), and occurs in three of his classes

(math, language arts, and science).

John’s disruptive behaviors specifically include yelling profanities, kicking over his desk or the

desk of another student, and tipping over his chair such that it falls to the floor with him in it. All

of his classes are general education classes, and other students complain when John has one of

his outbursts. At times he has injured himself or another student as well.

After John engages in a disruptive behavior (as described above), his teachers typically tell him

to go sit in the “calm corner” where there are books to read. He is allowed to stay there for 5-10

minutes before he is required to resume working on his tasks.

A behavior analyst conducts a functional behavior assessment and determines that the function

of the disruptive behavior is escape from task demands. She collects baseline data on the

dependent variable and then implements an intervention that involves John being given access to

the calm corner based on requesting a break from his schoolwork (and NOT based on engaging

in disruptive behavior). At first, John is allowed to ask for a break up to 5 times a day in the class

where the intervention is introduced (Classroom 1). (Later this will be faded down to one time

per day.)

After collecting data for several sessions while the intervention is in place, the intervention is

removed such that John does not get access to the calm corner based on requesting a break, but

instead gains access as a result of his disruptive behavior (as in baseline). In the fourth phase of

the study, the intervention is reinstated and the effect on disruptive behavior is again measured.

Part I: Treatment Effectiveness

1. Identify the dependent variable being addressed in the case study. To do this, you should

specify at least three specific target behaviors that are considered part of the overall response

class (i.e., the set of responses that achieve the same function).

2. Define each of the target behaviors in specific, observable, and measurable terms.

3. Identify what measurement dimension of the overall dependent variable will be assessed (i.e.,

frequency, duration, latency, etc.) with what type of recording system (e.g., permanent product

recording, event recording, interval recording, etc.). (Please refer to Table 7.2 on page 152 in your

textbook by Mayer et al. (2022) for a chart of possible methods and reasons to use them.)

4. Identify what single-subject design is being used to evaluate the effects of the intervention.

5. Create a graph of the data during the four phases (see table below). (You can refer to Exercise

2 from Course ABA504 to learn how to graph this type of single-subject design using Excel.)

6. Examine your graph and state whether the intervention was effective.

7. Explain your conclusion based on principles of visual analysis. Refer to the magnitude/level of

performance, the trend in performance, and the variability in performance for the data in each

phase.

Days Baseline Intervention

(Break Requests)

Baseline Intervention

(Break Requests)

1 4

2 5

3 4

4 6

5 2

6 0

7 2

8 1

9 4

10 6

11 4

12 5

13 1

14 2

15 0

16 1

Part II: Treatment Generalization

After the behavior analyst evaluated the effectiveness of the treatment, she wanted to fade the

number of times John asked for breaks so that he would not miss as much classwork. She

continued to collect data on the dependent variable while fading the number of allowed requests

from 5 to 1.

She was also interested in knowing if the effects would generalize to the other two classrooms

where John displayed disruptive behavior. She had asked the teachers of those classrooms to

collect data on John’s disruptive behavior throughout the baseline and intervention implemented

in Classroom 1.

The figure below shows additional data on the disruptive behavior across all three Classrooms at

the end of the second intervention phase of classroom 1, and during the phase when the number

of break requests were faded down to only one.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Fr eq

u en

cc y

o f

D is

ru p

ti ve

B eh

av io

rs

Day

Classroom 1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Fr eq

u en

cc y

o f

D is

ru p

ti ve

B eh

av io

rs

Day

Classroom 2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Fr eq

u en

cc y

o f

D is

ru p

ti ve

B eh

av io

rs

Day

Classroom 3

Break

Requests Fading Break Card

1) When the behavior analyst had teachers collect data in all three classrooms throughout

the study such that the data could be plotted on three graphs aligned vertically, what type

of single-subject design was the behavior analyst using?

2) The behavior analyst was interested in analyzing the presence or absence of change in the

dependent variable in Classrooms 2 and 3 in order to evaluate what type of

gen

Are you struggling with this assignment?

Our team of qualified writers will write an original paper for you. Good grades guaranteed! Complete paper delivered straight to your email.

Place Order Now